Can you be an activist and a lawyer?

Recently, I’ve reflected a lot on the intersection of being a legal professional, an academic, and an activist. This debate isn’t unique to the legal profession and especially climate and environmental advocacy has generated strong opinions on this subject. Let me explore some of the arguments and offer my reflections:

A recurring notion is that “lawyers must maintain objectivity and independence”. While these are admirable ideals, many critical scholars and academics agree that achieving true objectivity is elusive for human beings. Our backgrounds, values, education and life experiences shape our perspectives and decisions. This will feed into the decision we make in life because our values determines the kind of human we are. Those who prioritise personal gain over environmental stewardship may be drawn to profit-driven roles and care less about the subject of work and more about what it can offer them personally. While advocates with a cause close to their heart are more likely to seek out purpose driven jobs that center around people and planet.

More importantly, the question begs “how do we define an activist?” What image comes to mind when we hear this word? Media portrayals continue to shift perceptions and in recent years often portray activists as radicals and rule-breakers. This evolving narrative poses a challenge for professionals who also identify as activists. Yet at its core, activism is about campaigning for social change and is rooted in non-violence. However, many activist organisations both in the Global South and North are monitored and classified as “terrorist organisations”. That in itself is a worrying trend and another important topic for discussion. However, coming back to the core question – what does it mean to be an activist!? You do not need to be part of an organisation to be an activist. You don’t need to protest on the street to be an activist and you certainly do not need to break the law in order to be an activist.

In the face of existential threats like the climate crisis, advocating for change is not only justifiable but imperative. How could we not champion the causes close to our heart when there are plenty for whom power, status, and money are more important than any cause!? In essence, the choice between ego and eco is one we all face, including activists. Unfortunately, many prioritise personal recognition over their cause. However, the legacy we leave on this planet transcends individual accolades. In a few 100 years our individual lives, achievements, and followers won’t matter anymore but the world we left behind – that will matter! That is why I argue that we need activists and advocates from all professions and walks of life to work together for climate action and environmental protection within their fields of expertise, communities, and talents. Let’s prioritize the planet over personal recognition.

Our Earth. Our Home. Our Mission.

#LegalWednesdays #LeaWeimann #Activism #Academia #Advocacy #ClimateAction #Law #Achievements #Lawyers #EcoActivists #EcoNotEgo #PeopleOverProfit #OurEarth #OurMission